I just finished the first chapter 1 of Personal Learning Networks and it basically states that the world is changing quicker than we can keep up. After reading this, the one major question I have is, "Won't this hamper their social growth and interaction?" Pam Moran, who has been in the education field for 30 years, says, "It's like recreating education from scratch!" Then she talks about the "Big Shift" which she breaks down into six important shifts.
The first shift she talks about is "Analog to digital". This means paper will not be used in the classroom anymore, it will all be done digitally. Changing to the digital world sounds like a great idea, but, what happens to those who do not "convert" to the digital world? Do they just fall in to cyberspace? I'm a Secondary Math major and I honestly don't see how I could successfully integrate technology, blogs, and other networks in a math class. Math is a subject where you need to write out the problem and show the computations...not type it on the computer.
The second shift that is discussed is "Tethered to mobile". So instead of a traditional classroom with desks in a row with a teacher standing at the front of the room, work will all be done on mobile phones. I feel like instead of being focused on their work, they will be tempted to text their friends. I know when I was in school, I would have been totally distracted if I was using my phone to do class work. In fact, While writing the response blog, I had to write it by hand first and then type it because I would be way to tempted to see "What's new" on Facebook. The text even states, "Mobile technologies pose a huge opportunity and a huge challenge for classrooms."
The third shift is "Isolated to connected". Instead of students just having local teachers the can have teachers from around the world. I see this as the students having the opportunity to have "The best of the best" teachers, so to speak. However, I am a bit confused if the would affect there social interactions and growth, like the one-on-one time with the teacher.
The fourth shift discussed is "Generic to personal". This means instead of everyone learning the same thing, learning is self-directed; the student learns what they are interested in.
The fifth shift is "Creation not consumption". The students will take the retain the information and morph it into something of their own instead of taking in information and spitting it back out come test time. I would think this would help information be stored in the long term memory.
The sixth and final shift is "Closed system to Open systems", which means the role of copyright restrictions are reversed. However, I believe that this is an asset to students due to the fact that this makes it easier to share information and to learn it. Using a PLN includes making connections, negotiating, and collaborating.
I'm sure that this is a benefit to students, however, I believe that everybody needs social interactions, especially face to face. I just feel that this would under develop their social skills. If things switch to PLN's, people won't even talk anymore. Instead, they will text the person sitting next them.